Conflict of laws

When resolving conflict-of-laws issues in contract actions, the Florida Supreme Court has unambiguously indicated its intent to reject the more modern (and flexible) “significant contacts” analysis of the second Restatement of the law of conflicts, or the “center of gravity” analysis first pioneered by the New York Court of Appeals, choosing instead to adhere to the traditional rule of lex loci contractus. Goodman v. Olsen, 305 So.2d 753, 755 (Fla.1974); accord Walling v. Christian & Craft Grocery Co., 41 Fla. 479, 27 So. 46, 49 (1899). ''Fioretti v. Massachusetts Gen. Life Ins. Co.'', 53 F.3d 1228, 1235-36 (11th Cir. 1995)